Subjective Database
Subjective Database - Related Videos
16:17
The ITS2 Database
0 Views •
Cited by 52 •
2012
The ITS2 Database is a workbench for phylogenetic inference simultaneously considering sequence and secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2. This includes data collection with accurate annotation, structure prediction, multiple sequence-structure alignment and fast tree calculation. In a nutshell, this workbench simplifies first phylogenetic analyses to a few clicks.
01:28
Database Searching
0 Views •
2026
Effective research begins with the ability to navigate academic databases efficiently. Unlike general web search engines, scholarly databases are designed to index peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, and other credible academic publications. Developing a structured search strategy ensures that researchers can identify relevant, high-quality sources with precision. For example, when studying how sleep patterns relate to circadian rhythms in humans, researchers should move beyond...
11:18
Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2011
A thoracic oncology database was developed to serve as a comprehensive repository for clinical and laboratory data for the purposes of translational research. The database will serve translational cancer researchers within the Thoracic Oncology Research Program. This database is adaptable to other cancer models, as well as other human diseases.
07:48
Within-subjects Repeated-measures Design
0 Views •
2023
Source: Laboratories of Gary Lewandowski, Dave Strohmetz, and Natalie Ciarocco—Monmouth University A within-subjects, or repeated-measures, design is an experimental design where all the participants receive every level of the treatment, i.e., every independent variable. For example, in a candy taste test, the researcher would want every participant to taste and rate each type of candy. This video demonstrates a within-subjects experiment (i.e., one where there is an independent variable with...
05:36
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2024
This paper presents the protocols and clinical validation data for using a smartphone app to subjectively measure refractive error.
FAQs
Clinicians compare the patient’s or caregiver’s account with the available information, considering whether important symptoms, concerns, and relevant personal history have been addressed. They also note how consistently the information is reported. This evaluation helps determine which areas require clarification before practitioners interpret the account alongside objective findings.
A subjective database records the patient’s or caregiver’s descriptions, perceptions, symptoms, and concerns, whereas objective findings come from measurements, physical examination, or test results. Neither type stands alone: subjective information supplies personal context, while objective findings help evaluate the reported experience and support more complete clinical reasoning.
Open-ended questions allow patients to describe experiences in their own words instead of restricting responses to predetermined choices. Active listening helps practitioners recognize concerns and clarify incomplete information without overlooking the patient’s perspective. Together, these approaches produce a more useful account for selecting a focused physical examination and identifying relevant priorities.
Repeated updates show whether symptoms, perceptions, concerns, or treatment responses have changed from the patient’s established baseline. These changes add context to new measurements and test results, helping practitioners recognize developments that may require intervention. Ongoing documentation also preserves the patient’s evolving priorities for later clinical decisions.
The practitioner invites the patient or caregiver to describe symptoms, perceptions, concerns, and relevant personal history, using an interview supported by active listening and open-ended questions. The information is then documented, reviewed for completeness and reliability, and considered with objective findings. This sequence supports a focused examination and organized clinical reasoning.
The recorded account helps practitioners decide which aspects of the physical examination deserve attention and provides context for interpreting measurements or test results. It also clarifies how the patient experiences the condition and what matters to them. When updated and shared appropriately, the database improves communication among healthcare professionals and supports coordinated care.