Taps Device
Taps Device - Related Videos
19:44
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
0 Views •
Cited by 23 •
2009
We describe a computer-controlled device for investigating the sense of touch: the Tactile Automated Passive-finger Stimulator (TAPS). We describe the components of TAPS, and show how TAPS is used to administer a two-interval forced-choice tactile grating orientation test.
08:29
Thermal Measurement Techniques in Analytical Microfluidic Devices
0 Views •
Cited by 6 •
2015
Here, we present three protocols for thermal measurements in microfluidic devices.
10:36
Identifying Protein-protein Interaction in Drosophila Adult Heads by Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP)
0 Views •
Cited by 9 •
2013
Drosophila is famous for its powerful genetic manipulation, but not for its suitability of in-depth biochemical analysis. Here we present a TAP-based procedure to identify interacting partners of any protein of interest from the fly brain. This procedure can potentially lead to new avenues of research.
29:02
Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2007
11:06
Fabrication of Fully Solution Processed Inorganic Nanocrystal Photovoltaic Devices
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2016
This protocol describes the synthesis and solution deposition of inorganic nanocrystals layer by layer to produce thin film electronics on non-conductive surfaces. Solvent-stabilized inks can produce complete photovoltaic devices on glass substrates via spin and spray coating following post-deposition ligand exchange and sintering.
FAQs
Adjusting force, timing, or frequency changes the physical input while preserving a defined stimulation pattern. Researchers can then examine whether a biological response changes with the characteristics of the tap rather than with uncontrolled differences between trials. This approach helps map stimulus-response relationships and distinguish responses to different mechanical conditions.
Repeatability is the central advantage over manually delivered stimulation. Regulated taps reduce trial-to-trial variation in when and how strongly a sample or subject is contacted, so observed differences are more readily interpreted as biological responses. The same control supports systematic comparisons involving mechanosensation, reflexes, movement, or other responses to mechanical input.
The device connects an external mechanical event to a measurable biological change. A tap serves as the defined input, while behavioral, physiological, or biomechanical measurements represent the output. Comparing these elements helps investigators examine how biological systems detect mechanical forces and how that detection is expressed through reflexes, movement, or other measurable responses.
Researchers first identify the biological sample or experimental subject and define the mechanical stimulation required by the study. They then regulate relevant tap characteristics, such as timing, force, or frequency, deliver the taps consistently, and record the resulting behavioral, physiological, or biomechanical response. Repeated trials provide a basis for comparing conditions.
Controlled taps can be paired with behavioral, physiological, or biomechanical measurements. These outcomes may show whether a subject or sample changes its movement, exhibits a reflex, or produces another response associated with mechanical stimulation. Recording several outcome types allows the same physical input to be examined from complementary biological perspectives.
The device is particularly useful when researchers need to relate a precisely defined mechanical stimulus to responses such as mechanosensation, reflexes, or movement. Its regulated delivery improves reproducibility and supports systematic testing of stimulus-response relationships. This makes it valuable for experiments where variation in the physical input could otherwise obscure biological differences between trials.